Decreasing Uniform Chain
Problem
Let IID. Let be the first index where . Find , i.e. the smallest value among the first values selected. The answer will be in the form for integers and , where is Euler's constant. Find .
Original Problem Link: https://www.quantguide.io/questions/decreasing-uniform-chain
Solution
Step 1: Understand the structure
fails to be the running minimum the first time it's not smaller than everything before it. So right up to that point, every draw was a new record low: the sequence of running minima is strictly decreasing:
( always: with just one draw, trivially equals , so the streak can't break on the first draw.) We want , the value of the running minimum right before it stops being extended.
Step 2: The density of , for a fixed stopping index
Since itself is random, let's first fix a candidate value for and work out the (sub-)density of landing at some value , conditional on the streak lasting exactly this long. There are three independent requirements packed into this event:
-
The earlier draws must all exceed . For to be smaller than everything before it, we need . Each is Uniform and independent, so this happens with probability .
-
Those draws must also land in strictly decreasing order. Being bigger than isn't enough: they also have to arrive as specifically, not in some other order. Since the draws are independent and continuous, all orderings of are equally likely, so the probability of landing in exactly this one is .
-
The streak must break right after. We need , which (being an independent Uniform draw) happens with probability .
Multiplying these together, and including the density ( on ) of itself landing at :
Step 3: Does this integrate to a valid probability?
Before trusting , check that summing it over every possible stopping index , and integrating over , gives exactly , since must take some value.
Rewrite this with a common factorial in the denominator: since ,
This telescopes beautifully when summed from to :
Every term cancels against the next one, leaving just the very first piece. So the total probability really is . This confirms is a legitimate (sub-)density, and we can trust it to compute .
Step 4: Compute
Now weight by its density and integrate, then sum over :
The inner integral is a Beta integral: . Substituting in,
using . As in Step 3, split the numerator to make the sum telescope: write :
Step 5: Sum both pieces separately, via
Recall . The first piece, summed from :
The second piece, reindexing (so runs from to ):
Putting it together:
Step 6: Final answer
We're told , so matching gives , , hence
As a quick sanity check, , comfortably inside as it must be, and noticeably smaller than , which makes sense: is, by construction, the bottom of a streak of record lows, so it's biased well below the average of a single Uniform draw.